- Home
- James J. O'Donnell
The Ruin of the Roman Empire
The Ruin of the Roman Empire Read online
7888888888889
u
o
u
o
u
o
u
THE
o
u
Ruin
o
u
OF THE
o
u
o
Roman
u
o
u
EMPIRE
o
u
o
u
o
u
o
u
james j. o’donnell
o
u
o
u
o
u
o
u
o
u
o
u
o
hjjjjjjjjjjjk
This is Ann’s book
contents
Preface iv
Overture
1
s
pa rt i
t h e ode r ic ’s wor l d
1. Rome in 500: Looking Backward
47
2. The World That Might Have Been
107
s
pa rt i i
j u s t i n i a n ’s wor l d
3. Being Justinian
177
4. Opportunities Lost
229
5. Wars Worse Than Civil
247
s
pa rt i i i
gr eg ory ’s wor l d
6. Learning to Live Again
303
7. Constantinople Deflated: The Debris of Empire
342
8. The Last Consul
364
Epilogue
385
List of Roman Emperors 395
Notes 397
Further Reading 409
Credits and Permissions 411
Index 413
About the Author
Other Books by James J. O Donnell
’
Credits
Cover
Copyright
About the Publisher
preface
An American soldier posted in Anbar province during the twilight war
over the remains of Saddam’s Mesopotamian kingdom might have been
surprised to learn he was defending the westernmost frontiers of the an-
cient Persian empire against raiders, smugglers, and worse coming from
the eastern reaches of the ancient Roman empire. This painful recycling
of history should make him—and us—want to know what unhealable
wound, what recurrent pathology, what cause too deep for journalists and
politicians to discern draws men and women to their deaths again and
again in such a place. The history of Rome, as has often been true in the
past, has much to teach us.
The reign of Caesar Augustus consolidated and secured Roman domi-
nation in the lands around the Mediterranean. For 200 years after he died
in 14 CE, the prosperity and the pomposity of the empire were wondrous
to behold. Then, through a long series of lost opportunities, blunders, and
wars, Augustus’s heirs first showed that they could sustain their inheri-
tance in time of crisis, then worked to release their world from ancient
confrontations, and then in a tragic reversal bludgeoned into dust the op-
portunities Rome had created. This book tells the story of the central,
tragic episode, when the mighty Roman empire, unable to understand
itself or its world, chose to be true to its past ambitions and accomplish-
ments and so brought itself to ruin. The figure of the emperor Justinian
looms over the ruins, a figure mighty for his accomplishments, yet tragic
for the calamities that his reign both saw and spawned.
The stories I weave together here will be unfamiliar to most readers.
Specialists will disagree with at least some of what I venture and debate it
v
s Preface
heatedly, as they (and I) should. Nonspecialists should expect some sur-
prises. Because I mean to tell a fresh story with old materials, I have also
tried to recount the whole of it for the benefit of the reader who knows
none of it.
There are borders and boundaries being overrun and reinforced on
every page of this book, so it may be relevant to admit that I was born
about five miles outside the outermost boundary of the Roman empire
in Germany; grew up within a few miles of the U.S.-Mexico border in El
Paso (attending high school in a structure built by Jesuits hiding out from
an anticlerical revolution in Mexico); once owned, in the farthest west
of Ireland, a farm that my ancestors acquired when they were on the run
from the British after the battle of Kinsale; and have other family reasons
for knowing a lot about the history of Ukraine, the nation whose name
means “borderland.” Is it personal bias or scholarly judgment that makes
me say that great capitals and bustling cities are all well and good, but that
the constructive and creative energies of humankind are often best seen
among the mixtures and minglings of peoples at the margins of nations
and empires? I leave it to my readers to decide.
I have meditated and written this book in some unusual places, on
travels to every continent save one, in the intermissions of my unscholarly
duties as provost of a great university that has long understood itself to
have a global responsibility. Because my professional role now makes me
think in very concrete terms about shaping institutions to serve a more
democratically understood humankind, it was doubly important to ex-
plore and tell this story, not just for readers, but also so that I can do my
own job better.
Overture
The night sky changes every night yet never seems to change, as the sea-
sons bring the same stars in the same constellations on the same day of the
year, age after age. The sky defines the calendar, for the stars never fail.
For many thousands of years, until the smoke and light of human fires
and human ingenuity began to plunder the night of its glory, the order
and regularity of the stars surveyed and guided civilized life below.
The anomalies of the night offered hints. The planets (the word
comes from the Greek for “wanderers”) followed paths just unpredict-
able enough to challenge the mathematical abilities of generations, until
Copernicus found a simpler model. It was easier to believe that the plan-
ets were the chariots of gods—for gods were notoriously whimsical and
footloose—than to study the ancient mathematical models. Watchers
below easily gave religious readings to other occasional anomalies of the
night. Comets, shooting stars, the shimmer of the aurora borealis—all
were safer to ascribe to divinity than to a blind material order. For us, the
silence and darkness are beautiful, the stars a beautiful adornment; for
the ancients, the night was terrifying and familiar and mysteriously well
ordered.
Sitting beneath these stars and thinking in these ways, civilized hu-
mankind went about its business without grasping what evidence the
skies bore against its habitual ways of thinking. Unable to measure the
vast distances that separated the heavenly bodies patent before their eyes,
they took the dimensions of this planet—or, rather, of Eurasia and north-
ern Africa—as the measure of space. Incapable of grasping the evidence
of the skies as a sign of the great age of the world and the long revolu-
2 s the ruin of the roman empire
tions that bring us our flickering moment of consciousness, they mea-
sured time by the span of human memory and the stories of a few dozen
generations.
Small wonder that they understood their world so poorly. Small
wonder as well that even when we know better in principle and when
we can grasp the age and reach of the universe, we still fail to explore
and explain this world on a scale expansive enough to make it genuinely
intelligible. Science measures boldly the unimaginably large and small
of the cosmos, the breathtakingly fast and unspeakably slow movements
of bodies. History struggles to contain those universes in its imagination
while observing in minute detail as well. Historians struggle to think of
human experience in a way both congruent with the experience of mor-
tals and expansive enough to offer real explanation.
The sky of the Greeks and Romans, carrying the names of their gods
and heroes in arbitrary patterns of stars, still passes over our heads at
night. The Great Bear and Little Bear circle each oth
er at the top of the
sky, while Orion and his dog go hunting in the fall. They will do so long
after all of us now alive are gone, long after all our descendants have
destroyed themselves with nuclear fission or automotive exhausts. The
ancient communities that put those names on the sky have already disap-
peared or altered beyond recognition, and yet they continue to shape the
world in which we live.
This is a book about changes on earth below that left ancient heroes
marooned in the sky, stripped of their celestial powers. If we can under-
stand those changes—and what has not changed—we may have a better
chance of avoiding calamities of our own.
We will begin with a man who thought that the world below the stars
was flat.
Cosmas the Voyager
The two visitors, skillful and knowledgeable merchants, found the obelisk
and the throne facing west, away from the sea. They stood at the gate of
the city of Adoulis, a trading town on the Red Sea coast of what is now
Eritrea. The land’s distinctive products were ivory from elephants, horn
from rhinoceroses, and tortoiseshell. Both obelisk and throne pointed up
into the mountains, toward the great city of Axum, more than 100 miles
Overture s 3
away in what was already called Ethiopia. Their inscriptions honored the
Hellenistic king Ptolemy III Euergetes (“Benefactor”), by then dead for
about 750 years. Ptolemy had probably never come this far south, but these
lands still paid tribute—you could call it a tax, or you could call it protec-
tion money—to Egypt when they were not at war with the Egyptians.
The throne was cut from a single piece of gleaming white marble. The
visitors were surprised to see this, because they knew of such stone only in
the Mediterranean, from the island of Proconnesus in the Sea of Marmara
near Constantinople. The throne’s base was square, with four delicate col-
umns at the corners and one more supporting the seat at the center. The
obelisk was carved of basalt on a square base and stood behind the throne.
Both objects were inscribed in Greek.
The manuscript illustration we have of the scene (a copy of an original
from an eyewitness) makes it hard to get at their sizes, but the throne was
perhaps human-size, and the obelisk not out of scale with it. In a future
era, Mussolini would take another of Axum’s obelisks from Ethiopia to
Italy to stand as a token of his imperial aspirations in Rome. A few years
ago its fragments were disassembled and returned to Ethiopia.
Mountainous Axum was a venerable Christian city by then (the 520s
CE), and if any place on the planet could ever reasonably claim to be the
home of the Ark of the Covenant, Axum would be it. Ellatzbaas, king of
the Axumites, was as Christian as his ancestors had been for a century at
least, though his brand of Christianity was falling out of favor elsewhere
and would gradually lose touch with most of the Christian worlds in the
years to come. Now Ellatzbaas prepared to descend from his capital 7,000
feet above sea level and go to war across the Red Sea against the Him-
yarites, dwellers in what is now Yemen. Fastidious in preserving and pro-
claiming royal glories, he sent to Adoulis to have the inscriptions on the
throne copied for him and placed at the gates of Adoulis. This required
craftsmanship and intelligence and led Asbas, the governor there, to ask
our two traveling merchants to do the copying for him.
They were Menas, who later became a monk in Sinai and died there;
and Cosmas, who came from Alexandria. From their visit, Cosmas kept
his own copy of the inscriptions, and he included them in his descrip-
tive twelve-volume book about such places. The two travelers also found
sculptured images of Heracles and Hermes on the back of the throne and
disagreed over their symbolic interpretation. They represented power
4 s the ruin of the roman empire
and wealth to the merchant who would become a monk, but Cosmas
thought they stood for deeds and words instead. Merchants like Menas
and Cosmas traveled to Adoulis because they knew that sellers brought
incense down from the mountains there and that one could buy it at a
good price to transport across and around Arabia to Roman and Persian
markets. This was good business, supplementing what Yemen produced
across the water.
Cosmas returned to Alexandria to write his stories, and that’s why we
know of him. Christian Topography, his lavish illustrated book, is some-
thing that only a man of substance and wealth could have produced, and
it survives in three medieval copies. One, made in Constantinople in the
ninth century, now resides in the Vatican library; two others were made
in the eleventh century. The one from Cappadocia, deep in Asia Minor,
has migrated to Sinai in Egypt; the one from Mount Athos, that monas-
tic metropolis west of Constantinople, is in Florence’s Laurentian library.
What they share is an abundance of illustrations, all going back to Cos-
mas’s original, pictures that supplement the wonders he sought to describe
in words. The Florentine manuscript bears the name Cosmas added in a
later hand, so that’s what we call him, but most medieval readers knew
him only as he wanted to be known: as “just a Christian,” anonymous
and devout. His contemporaries, though, found anonymity to be precious
and polemical, a sign of a man taking sides in the religious quarrels of the
time.
Cosmas and his comrade were both sophisticated, experienced trav-
elers, yet Adoulis still felt like the end of the earth to them. We can see
instead that it was more accurately the center of the human universe; that
when they were there, it was a cockfighting pit of geopolitical rivalry. The
Himyarite realm lay not far away across the strait of Bab el Mandeb. At
the narrowest point of the strait, just where it squeezed the passage down
to the Indian Ocean, the Red Sea was no more than twenty miles wide,
with an island midway across. Himyar was an ancient land, variously con-
tending for control with nearby Saba (the biblical Sheba) and with the
Ethiopians across the water. From of old, the land there was fertile, its
richness enhanced by the fabulous Marib dam, a third of a mile long and
rising fifteen feet above water level, feeding a system of canals that ensured
a regular, reliable water supply to the region. Inscriptions, not necessarily
legendary, say it was built in the seventh century BCE, but the dam was un-
Overture s 5
doubtedly renewed, expanded, and strengthened as time passed and craft
grew. There was a serious dam break in 450 CE, and Cosmas may not have
known when he wrote his story in the late 540s that another also occurred
in 542. The last, and most catastrophic, occurred in 570, and with it came
the end of agricultural prosperity and Himyarite domination.
At the moment of Cosmas’s visit to Axum, however, the Himyarite
nation was still formidable. Its kingdom was Jewish in a world where
Christianity was more and more the officially sponsored religion, even at
the fringes of empire. (To be fair, however, the label “Jewish” may over-
state its resemblance to other communities that venerated the books of
Moses.) In 518, one skirmish between Ethiopians and Himyarites led to
something like a civil war between Christians and Jews in Yemen, during
which there was an anti-Christian pogrom by the leader Yusuf Ashaar,
nicknamed Dhu Nuwas (“the man with a ponytail”). He concluded the
conflict with a massacre of Christians in Najran in the early 520s. One ac-
count alleged that Dhu Nuwas ordered 20,000 Christians thrown into pits
of boiling oil for refusing to convert to Judaism. Under this man with the
ponytail, the Himyarites savored a fleeting, doomed independence.
Then Ellatzbaas launched his invasion from Ethiopia, beginning with
a solemn Mass in Axum cathedral, followed by the blessing of a fleet of
seventy ships from Adoulis, and ending by establishing a puppet regime in
Himyar that he controlled.
Ellatzbaas didn’t act entirely on his own. Behind him lay the support